Most patients think hard about the best way to recover their health and to accelerate the healing process.
This verb noun collocation – recover health – is very weak. Let’s take a look at the two words separately.
Recover + noun
The strongest collocation for recover + noun seems to be associated with money:
- Apple invested heavily in the iPhone but soon recovered their research and development costs.
- Fraud victims find it difficult to recover their money.
- The state’s Consumer Protection Assistance Fund (CPAF) can help victims, who have filed complaints with our office, recover their losses.
Verb + health
Meanwhile, verb + health gives us:
- Most people make an effort to improve their health.
- regular exercise and a balanced diet can help to maintain good health.
- I’m quite concerned about my uncle’s health.
Recover (no object)
In the context of health, recover is usually intransitive:
- I hope your uncle recovers quickly.
- If you take this medicine you will recover in a few days.
- You had a bad fall. You need some time to recover.
Returning to our opening example, either of the following are possible:
- Most patients think hard about the best way to recover and to accelerate the healing process.
- Most patients think hard about the best way to improve their health and to accelerate the healing process.
Zoos have evolved to prioritise research that benefits for animals.
This error might happen because students have seen (1) the adjective phrase beneficial for, or (2) the noun benefits followed by the preposition for: Continue reading
Animals that are used to perform are easy to get tired.
If we reduce this to its most basic grammar, we get:
Obviously that’s not what the writer intended. Maybe we should look at some examples!
- My answer was pretty easy to understand.
= My answer was easy.
- The daily instructions are very easy to follow.
= The daily instructions are easy.
- The game is really pretty easy to play.
= The game is easy.
Now contrast the previous examples with the following.
- Generally it is easier for men to handle horses.
= Handling horses is easy (NOT men are easy!)
- It is easy for smartphone users to use QR codes.
= Using QR codes is easy (NOT smartphone users are easy!)
- It is easy for people to misunderstand religious language and ritual.
= Misunderstanding is easy (NOT people are easy!)
It is easy for us to correct our opening example if we begin “It is easy for.!”
- It is easy for animals that are used to perform to get tired.
[it is easy/difficult for + noun + to + v1]
This structure is shown in several previous posts – here, and in the song Lemon Squeezy. Check them out!
An alternative improvement would be to use an adverb:
- Animals that are used to perform get tired easily.
..and for a higher IELTS score, avoid ‘get’ by using the verb form of ‘tired’:
- Animals that are used to perform tire easily.
If you’re studying in Australia you should make an effort to see the amazing Circus OZ – an animal-free circus!
Is this a good way for students to prepare their new academic environments?
- I’m preparing dinner.
(You’re mixing ingredients, boiling, baking, frying, etc.)
- I’m preparing for dinner.
(You’re washing your hands. You’re going to eat very soon.)
A baby prepares for dinner while
his mother prepares dinner!
- I’m preparing an exam.
(You’re writing the questions that someone will answer when they sit the exam.)
- I’m preparing for an exam.
(You’re reading and thinking about questions that might be included in an exam that you are about to take.)
These men prepared a disaster.
They made the first atom bomb!
Some people prepare for disaster.
Returning to our opening example, you probably need:
- Is this a good way for students to prepare for their new academic environments?
If students are preparing their academic environments, they’re already there – possibly they’re busy arranging furniture in their accommodation, putting books on shelves, etc. If they’re preparing for their new environments, they’re not there yet because they’re not yet ready – possibly they need to study more first, pass exams, save money, etc.
At the same time parents spend lots of money on their children because they consider traveling costs and additional expenses during their children take their gap year.
Indonesians tend to translate selama as during, but then they run into this grammatical error.
In English, during requires the following grammar:
- ..parents spend lots of money on their children because they consider traveling costs and additional expenses during their children’s gap year.
[signal + noun (period of time)]
Indonesians might consider using while as a translation for selama, in which case they can follow up with a sentence:
- ..parents spend lots of money on their children because they consider traveling costs and additional expenses while their children take their gap year.
[signal + sentence]
Taking a gap year gives certain advantages to young people before attending colleges.
Yet another of those dreaded words that have slightly different meanings in their countable and uncountable forms.
1. College, countable
If you attend colleges, then..
- you attend more than one college in more than one location, either sequentially or at the same time.
- possibly you keep changing your mind about what you want to study?
- possibly you are never satisfied with the college you happen to be attending?
- possibly you are super human!
2. College, uncountable
If you attend college, then..
- you are enrolled on a course of study.
- your course lasts for a fixed period of time.
- you probably study on the same campus every day.
- when you finish your course, you hope to receive some kind of qualification.
Perhaps it’s best to think of attend college, or go to college as phrasal verbs that carry all of these meanings. All of the above also applies to the word ‘university’.
Since young people want to be considered independent humans. They try to prove their ability for themselves and other people as well.
This student is experimenting with alternatives for because but has found herself in hot water. There are two possible improvements:
- Since young people want to be considered independent humans, they try to prove their ability for themselves and other people as well.
[since + cause sentence + comma + effect sentence]
- Young people try to prove their ability for themselves and other people as well, since they want to be considered independent humans.
[effect sentence + comma + since + cause sentence]
In both of these examples, since is indeed an exact synonym for because, and so is as. However, as and since are more likely to appear at the beginning of a sentence, whereas because is more common after a comma:
||beginning of sentence
||beginning of sentence
Returning to our opening example, we could also get rid of the word humans since it is clear we’re not talking about aliens or rocks:
- Since young people want to be considered independent, they try to prove their ability for themselves and other people as well.
The over-use of the word human may be cultural. See here, here and here.
Climate change is a depressing topic, but it provides us with a rich source of cause effect language that we can borrow and use in our IELTS speaking and writing.
Some world leaders continue to deny that human activity is to blame for global warming, but the following text argues that humans are in fact largely responsible.
The text features some quite sophisticated cause effect signals. Try the gapfill and be sure to review alternative answers mentioned in the answer key (available after submitting answers). Continue reading
First of all I love the culinary.
Here an Indonesian IELTS candidate has made a positive claim about a place he or she likes, and is supporting that claim with another positive comment about the food there. This candidate perhaps feels that food is not a particularly ‘high-band’ word, and is experimenting with a more sophisticated synonym.
The word culinary has been imported from English into Indonesian, but it has changed slightly in the process. Whereas in Indonesian kuliner can be used either as an adjective or a noun, the English culinary can only be used as an adjective. And so straight away the candidate has produced a word form error.
If you want a high-band synonym for ‘food’, you might try:
- First of all I love the cuisine.
But be careful! Cuisine (a word borrowed from French!) is used in English to refer to the kind of food preparation you might expect in an expensive restaurant, or the kind of cooking that wins prizes in competitions. On the other hand if you’re talking about the kind of food that ordinary people eat in a particular country, day-to-day, then you’re talking about their food:
- First of all I love the food.
So what have we learned?
- Words borrowed from other languages can change in several ways:
- form : culinary – kuliner
- meaning : special food only – all food
- grammar : adjective – adj/noun
- Using synonyms in an attempt to appear more sophisticated can get you into trouble. Only do it if you’re confident that you have chosen a synonym that carries the right meaning and fits grammatically into a phrase or sentence.
You only need little equipment to play badminton.
This has two literal meanings, both of which seem odd:
- You only need small equipment to play badminton.
- You need not enough equipment to play badminton.
Clearly the writer did not intend either of these meanings. First of all there is obviously a standard size for badminton equipment, which is neither small nor large. Secondly, it would be impossible to play badminton without ‘enough’ equipment!
Little and a little have quite different meanings. Compare:
Gosh I’m thirsty after that game! Do you have any water left?
Yes, I still have a little. Here you are.
[a little = not much, but enough]
I wish we could play badminton more often!
Yes, but because of my job I have little time.
[little = not enough]
In the opening example, the writer is – I think – trying to say that playing badminton does not involve a lot of equipment:
- You don’t need much equipment to play badminton.
In this case, not much means enough, and that’s good because it means that badminton is inexpensive compared to, say, photography, which generally involves a lot of expensive equipment and therefore a lot of spending!